
:: Award
Programs
::
Chapter News
::
Calendar
::
Discussion
::
Foundation
::
Member Search
::
Photo Gallery
::
Legislative News
::
Wage Rates
::
Resumes Online
::
Weather Online
::
YCC
::
Safety Online •
Stand Down •
Compliance
•
Toolbox Talks
•
Online Training
::
Membership
•
Member News
•
Industry Links
::
About QUOIN
•
How to Join
•
Meet the Staff
 QUOIN
An AGC Chapter
Offices in Dallas,
Fort Worth and
East Texas
972.647.0697
972.247.1930 Fax
::
Maps to offices
•
Dallas
•
Fort Worth
•
East Texas
Comments? Suggestions? Email us at:
web@quoin.org
|
QUOIN
Contractor Members Sign Cooperative Agreement With OSHA

Pictured
left to right: Jim Archer, Spring Valley Construction;
Eugene Freeman, OSHA-Dallas; Steve Beuchaw, Spring Valley
Construction;
Rick Rank, OSHA-Fort Worth; Stephen Boyd, OSHA-Dallas;
Mike Gray, Spring Valley Construction; Raleigh Roussell,
QUOIN
On
January 11, 2008, Spring Valley Construction Company, L.P.
was officially recognized as a participant in the Cooperative
Safety Program (CSP).
Spring
Valley was accepted and formally signed into the Cooperative
Safety Program, which was established to formalize an effort
between QUOIN and OSHA to recognize companies with
exemplary safety and health programs and encourage companies
to continue building their safety and health performance.
QUOIN and OSHA signed the Cooperative Agreement on May 6,
2004.
The
organizations mutually recognize the importance of
ensuring a safe and healthful work environment in the construction
industry.
For
more information on how your firm can get involved in the
Cooperative Agreement, contact QUOIN at (972) 647-0697.
|
|
QUOIN Contractor Members Sign Cooperative Agreement With OSHA
On August 7, 2007, Rogers-O’Brien Construction Company, Inc. was officially recognized as a participant in the Cooperative Safety Program (CSP).
Rogers-O’Brien was accepted and formally signed into the Cooperative Safety Program, which was established to formalize an effort between ABC, QUOIN and OSHA to recognize companies with exemplary safety and health programs and encourage companies to continue building their safety and health performance.
ABC, QUOIN and OSHA signed the Cooperative Agreement on May 6, 2004.
The three organizations mutually recognize the importance of ensuring a safe and healthful work environment in the construction industry.
For more information on how your firm can get involved in the Cooperative Agreement, contact QUOIN at (972) 647-0697. |

Pictured left to right: Dallas OSHA Office Acting Area Director, Stephen Boyd; Fort Worth OSHA Office Area Director, Dean Wingo; Rogers-O’Brien Construction Company President, Preston McAfee; QUOIN Chapter President and CEO, Raleigh Roussell; Rogers-O’Brien Construction Company Environmental Safety & Health Director, Jim Fentress. |
|

Pictured left to right
is Fort Worth OSHA Office Area Director, Dean Wingo,
Charter Builders, Ltd. President, Charles DeVoe;
T.A.S. Commercial Concrete Owner, Mark Scully; Bob
Moore Construction, Inc. Owner, Mike Moore and Dallas
OSHA Office Area Director, Kathy Delaney. |
|
QUOIN Contractor
Members Sign Cooperative Agreement With OSHA
(Dallas, Texas) On February 7, 2007, Charter Builders,
Ltd., Bob Moore Construction and T.A.S. Commercial Concrete
were officially recognized as participants in the Cooperative
Safety Program (CSP).
Three
firms were accepted and formally signed into the Cooperative
Safety Program, which was established to formalize an
effort between ABC, QUOIN and OSHA to recognize companies
with exemplary safety and health programs and encourage
companies to continue building their safety and health
performance.
ABC,
QUOIN and OSHA signed the Cooperative Agreement on May
6, 2004.
The
three organizations mutually recognize the importance
of ensuring a safe and healthful work environment in the
construction industry.
For
more information on how your firm can get involved in
the Cooperative Agreement, contact QUOIN at (972) 647-0697. |
Construction
Site Safety Class Information
( Click here to
redirect to the registration page for scheduled classes,
times and locations)
CSS #1 > Construction Safety
Programs & Crisis Management
Course Syllabus: Construction Safety Programs:
Establishing Specific Policies, Required Written Training
Programs, Posting Requirements, Accident Investigations,
Drug Abuse Policy; Crisis Management: Establishing Response
Team, Securing Site, Public Relations, Responding to
Media
CSS #2 > General Safety
and Health, OSHA Inspections and Citations
Course Syllabus: Employer/Employee Rights and
Responsibilities, OSHA Inspections, Jobsite Posting
Requirements, General Duty Clause – 5(a)(1), OSHA
Informal Conference and Formal Hearing Procedures, Legal
Rights During and Following an OSHA Inspection, OSHA
Citation – How they are levied, Establishing an
OSHA Preparedness Plan (G.C. & Sub), Record Keeping,
Self-Inspection Programs, Jobsite Planning
CSS #3 >
Personal Protective Equipment, Tools, Signs & Signals, Material Handling
Course Syllabus: Personal Protective and Life
Saving Equipment: Head, Hearing, Eye and Face Protection,
Safety Belts/Harnesses, Lifelines and Lanyards
Signs, Signals and Barricades: Accident Prevention Signs
and Tags, Signaling and Barricades – Jobsite Equipment,
Vehicular Traffic; Hand and Power Tools: Mandated Training,
P.P.E.’s; Materials Handling: General Storage
Requirements, Proper Usage, Disposal of Waste Materials,
Rigging Equipment
CSS 4 > Temporary Electrical,
Welding & Cutting, Fire Protection/Prevention
Course Syllabus: Temporary Electrical: GFCI's,
Temporary Lighting, Load Centers, Temporary Outlets,
Extension Cords, Assured Electrical, Grounding ProgramWelding
& Cutting: ARC/Acetelyne, Protection of Onsite Personnel,
Personal Protective Equipment, Compressed Gas Cylinders,
Confined Spaces, Electrodes, Cables, & Connectors,
Hazardous Atmospheres, VentilationFire Prevention: Program
Development, Equipment Requirements, Ignition Hazards,
Employee Training, General Housekeeping & Storage
Requirements
CSS #5 > Subpart M Fall
Protection Requirements, Subpart X Ladders & Stairways
Course Syllabus: Subpart M: Open sided Floors,
Walls, Roofs, Scope & General Requirements, Fall
Prevention - Floors, Walls, Roofs, Fall Protection -
Personal Protective Equip.; Subpart X: Ladders &
Stairways, General Requirements, Written Company Training
Program, Ladders - Proper use, setup, inspection, extension,
step, job-built; Stairways
CSS 6 > Aerial / Scissor
Lifts, Motorized Equipment
Course Syllabus: Motorized Equipment: Backhoes,
Loaders, Skidsteers, etc.: Personal Guarding/Protection,
Employee Training, R.O.P.S., Seat Belt Requirements,
Operating/Transporting Safety, Vehicular Traffic SafetyAerial
Lifts-Scissor Lifts & Boom Lifts: OSHA Fall Protection
Requirements, Employee/Operating Training, Minimum Safe
Approach Distance, (MSAD) to Electrical Hazards, Manufacturer's
Safety, Operation Requirements, Equipment Warning Devices,
Equipment Stability Factors
CSS #7 > Scaffolding
Course Syllabus: Scaffolding: Steel Frame,
Mobile
Competent Person Requirements: Erecting/Dismantling
Safety, Access/Egress Requirements, Proper Decking Requirements;
Stability/Footing Requirements, Demolition and Concrete
&
Masonry
CSS #8 > Confined Space
Entry
Course Syllabus: Written Company Program, Permit-Required,
Confined Space Entry, Non-Permit Required, Confined
Space Entry, Atmospheric Testing, Monitoring, Emergency
Rescue, Engineering Controls, Entrants/Attendant/Supervisor
CSS #9 > Steel Erection
Course Syllabus: Subpart R: Definitions, Site
Layout, Construction Sequence, Hoisting and Rigging,
Structural Steel Assembly, Beam and Column Anchorage,
Concrete Requirements, Joist Bridging and Decking Requirements,
Falling Object Protection, Specific Fall Protection,
and Training Requirements.
CSS #10 > Excavation and
Trench Safety
Course Syllabus: Competent Person Requirements:
OSHA Definition, Responsibilities, Excavation Hazards:
Cave-Ins, Access/Egress, Hazardous Atmospheres; Hazardous
Waste Discovery: Establish Reactionary Plan, Employee
Training; Soil Classification: Field Identification
Tests & Observances, Lab Soil Reports; Sloping and
Shoring: Maximum Allowable Slope per Soil Classifications,
Timber and Aluminum Shoring, Trench Boxes, Access and
Egress
CSS #11 > Cranes - Site
Management
Course Syllabus: Responsibilities: Owners,
Operators, Site Supervisors; Site Operations: Personnel
Protection, Inspections, Crane Location; Crane Accidents:
Electrocutions, Operator/Rigging Errors, Struck by Load
Crane Failures: Tipping (Stability), Support Failure,
Outriggers, Operator Error, Breaking (Structural), Boom
Hoist, Boom, Outriggers
CSS #12 > Creating Safe
Behavior on the Jobsite
Course Syllabus: Examining Your Organizations
Safety Culture, Why Do People behave unsafely?, Barriers
to Continuous Safety Improvement, Attitude, behavior,
and Safety improvement, Creating a Safe Culture in your
organization, Leading for Safety, How does a "Safe"
Leader act?, How does an "unsafe" Leader act?,
Why lead for Safety?, Key Elements of Behavior Based
Safety Program, Evaluating current Safety Performance,
Conducting an observation, Overview of Safety Leadership
I & II |
Assured Electrical Equipment Grounding Conductor Program
Inspect – Test – Color Code Schedule
All Electrical Tools, Extension Cords, and Equipment
Electrical Codes:
First Quarter: (January 1-March 31) White
Second Quarter: (April 1-June 30) Green
Third Quarter: (July 1-September 30) Red
Fourth Quarter: (October 1-December 31)
Orange
White
Paper:
Best Practices in Construction Safety
Accepting the challenge of moving safety
to a higher level
Safety Leaders Representing
QUOIN Contractor Members
Mission
possible or impossible? Can safety in our industry be moved to
a higher level? And if so, what will it take to go the extra mile?
Safety leaders have tried to answer these questions for years
and while some of us think we know the answers or have seen some
progress, why has dramatic change and improvement been so elusive.
What
we have learned is that achieving zero incidents 100% of the time
is not an easy task especially when you have multiple people constantly
changing from one jobsite to another. This is complicated further
by accelerated project schedules and minimal time to train new
workers or retrain our existing workforce. As much as we would
like one simple solution to improve safety, we have come to grips
with the fact that it will require a set of complex, interrelated
strategies and solutions all working together to bring about real
change.
Improving
safety requires effort and commitment by everyone at a company.
Safety is everyone’s job and not just the responsibility
of the Safety Director. Making everyone responsible for their
own safety and the safety of those around them requires more than
just a "safety program" regardless of how effective
it is. A big part of the solution has to do with a company’s
ethics and values and how it goes about treating people and conducting
itself as a business enterprise. Thus, culture and leadership
play a big part in transitioning to a higher level in safety.
Most
important, we believe that being safe is the morally right thing
to do. Taking steps to be as safe as possible also makes as much
common sense as it does business sense. Setting high safety goals
and achieving them is all about sending home an injury-free workforce
each day with no incidents, no fatalities and no near misses.
It is also about not having to be the bearer of bad news to any
family member or loved one.
Of course,
the biggest cost of all in being unsafe is the loss of human life
or a debilitating or life-long injury. In addition to the impact
on this person and their family, unsafe work conditions also affects
workforce morale and the ability of our industry to attract and
retain new workers to the field. A reputation for unsafe work
practices also affects the image of an entire industry, a region,
a general contractor, a specialty contractor, or even a particular
superintendent or foreman overseeing a jobsite. Add in higher
costs of insurance and lost days of productivity and it is easy
to make the case for a sense of urgency in taking new steps to
improve safety regardless of how well a company thinks it is doing
now. Safety pays in more ways than one!
Despite
impressive safety gains by QUOIN contractor members in recent
years, the ability to go from "good to great" has remained
a challenge. Even though many of us have achieved anywhere from
92 to 96% effectiveness in safety, when it comes to human lives,
we know this is not good enough. We have worked diligently together
for years in the Chapter's safety committee and later in safety
forums trying to find the one secret that would make a difference
and elevate our existing safety program to a much higher level.
New ideas have been introduced, obstacles have been identified
and solutions have been shared for what we believe it will take
to go the extra mile in bringing safety to a new level.
The
result of our collaboration includes twelve best-in-class industry
practices that we believe will lead to zero incidents and 100%
effectiveness in safety.
Best-in-Class
Industry Practices
Ongoing
Safety Education and Training
People can only be responsible for what they know and are trained
to do. Safety knowledge is important for field personnel and everyone
else in the company. Project managers, project engineers and even
the president of a company who visits a jobsite need safety education
in order to properly model and encourage safe behavior. In addition
to traditional classroom training, we have to find new ways of
bringing safety education to our jobsites. We are encouraged to
minimize the lecture approach in favor of “learning by doing”
since this is preferred by most adults. Integrating safety education
into our daily interactions with workers can be done by pointing
out what they are doing safe and where they can improve.
Demonstrated Management Commitment and
Involvement
Engage company leaders in playing an active role in safety
whether it is communicating the safety message, visiting jobsites
to observe safety behavior, singling out and recognizing an individual’s
“safe” behavior, or making sure that adequate resources
are available to support the desired safety goals. Clearly, management
sets the tone for safety and their commitment to a safe workplace
is the example others will follow.
Zero Tolerance of Unsafe Behavior
When
it comes to safety, a line in the sand has to be drawn on what
you expect and what you are willing to tolerate. To truly achieve
zero incidents and injuries, there is no middle ground. You are
either behaving safely or you are not. Accepting or turning a blind
eye to unsafe behavior only perpetuates an unsafe workplace. Removing
unsafe workers from a jobsite is a powerful way to get your message
across that you are serious when it comes to safety. All it takes
is one unsafe act to cause a fatality.
Observe and Document “Safe”
and “Unsafe” Behaviors
Historically, the construction industry has focused solely
on the observation, reporting and documentation of “unsafe”
behaviors. Safety violations and the penalties associated with
these violations have long been in the limelight. Now to properly
assess safety results, attention is turning to the thousands of
“safe” practices going on every day at jobsites. This
will help to properly contrast and compare “unsafe”
practices. New methodologies are available to assist contractors
in tracking leading safety indicators to help us predict and prevent
safety injuries before they happen.
Reward and Recognition of Safe Practices
Basic
psychology teaches that people behave in a way congruent with how
they are rewarded and recognized. Another words, we get the behavior
that we reward and recognize. We believe it is still a good idea
to celebrate company-wide safety achievements and recognize an
entire construction team for safe behavior. However, we believe
it is just as important to seek out and recognize individual safety
performers who help make a difference to overall jobsite safety.
This might include recognition for an experienced worker who takes
a new person under their wing to coach them on safety. Or it might
include a project manager who walked the jobsite with a superintendent
and took the time to praise one or more workers for tying off properly.
Worker Involvement and Participation
Safety is
about the workforce and employees taking ownership for their own
safe behavior as well as the safety of others around them. Individuals
responsible for safety often have the best ideas or solutions on
how to go about creating a safer work environment. The fastest
way to get buy-in for anything including safety is to involve people
themselves in coming up with the safety measures they want to see
at a particular jobsite. Get your people talking about safety and
see to it that a safety dialogue continues. Identify jobsite leaders
who report each week on “what is being done
well in safety” and “where they see the biggest opportunity
to improve.”
Attract, Recruit and Retain Healthy and Safety-Minded
Workers
Selection criteria and hiring practices
have a lot to do with the workforce that is put in place
on any given construction jobsite. In addition to initial
and random drug and alcohol testing, what other up-front
screening measures are in place to assure that workers
being hired are individuals who value good health and safety
for themselves as well as those around them. If safety
and health is not coming up in job interviews, then maybe
we are settling for “bodies” to
fill job openings rather than workers who will help us achieve
our safety goals. The same is true when a general contractor qualifies
a specialty contractor. What criteria are in place to bring only
safety-minded specialty contractors onto a jobsite? And are specialty
contractors showing a preference for working with proactive, safety-minded
general contractors? Putting the right team together is key
Safety Planning
Putting a written safety plan
together for a company helps to get everyone on the same page about
safety goals and the strategies being used to reach these goals.
Input into this plan from the field as well as the office is critical
to the plan’s success.
In addition to safety planning by the company, each construction
project requires advance planning to address site-specific safety
issues and to build in safety measures on the front end of a job.
As the landscape changes day to day on a project, up-front planning
will help workers make adjustments in their safety behavior.
Measure Safety Progress
Once safety goals are
established, it helps to measure progress against these goals.
Historically, construction projects report how many days are worked
injury free as well as the number of lost days due to accidents
or injuries. Consider setting a zero recordable injury rate goal
at the outset of a project or at the beginning of a company’s
fiscal year, and report progress against this goal. Consider setting
a goal of working 352 days without any lost time and report lost
days against this number. Set positive, quantifiable, specific
goals and make everyone aware of these goals and understand the
part they play individually in helping to achieve these goals.
Instead of reporting performance, establish goals and measure progress
against these goals.
Build a High-Performing Jobsite Safety Team
Building
a team around safety is just as important if not more important
than building a team to deliver a project on time and within budget.
Bringing team members on board who have a commitment to safety
will help get the team off to a good start. Setting project safety
goals, communicating and clarifying safety expectations for all
team members, and creating opportunities for open feedback about
safety performance will help the team perform stronger in safety.
The project manager and superintendent provide the team with safety
leadership who are then responsible to help the team perform well
in this area. While the accountability for safety is ultimately
demonstrated on the front line or in the field, it takes an entire
company to deliver the proper training and put in place the processes,
policies and procedures to insure a safe worksite.
Develop Safety Leaders
Safety leadership can
be cultivated throughout a company and everywhere on a jobsite.
Leadership is all about bringing out the best in ourselves as well
as the people around us. And when it comes to safety, leadership
has to do with first holding ourselves accountable before we look
to others. Through our actions, new leaders and safety champions
are encouraged to come forward to help us achieve safety goals.
Again safety is a shared leadership responsibility that no one
person can achieve working on their own. Effective leaders communicate
well, encourage positive behavior, recognize achievements, develop
people, inspire action, and most of all set an example for others
to follow. Become a “safety
coach” and not a “safety cop.”
Meet and Exceed OSHA Standards
A company’s
safety goals need to extend beyond a desire to just meet OSHA standards
since OSHA guidelines represent the minimum acceptable level of
safety performance. Helping a workforce set higher safety goals
is key to moving safety to a much higher level. Contractors that
seek out and develop good working relationships with OSHA representatives
are learning that this is a win-win for everyone.
[This paper is possible due to the dedication, experience and
many contributions of hundreds of safety leaders who have worked
tirelessly in QUOIN’s Safety Forums to move safety to a higher
level to benefit their company and the industry]
|
QUOIN’s Benchmarking Leads to New "Best
Practices" in Construction Safety
By Raleigh Roussell, President and CEO, QUOIN
Benchmarking is the
search for best practices that will lead companies to superior
performance in any aspect of their business.
|
As you probably know, “benchmarking”
has become a buzzword for companies across all industries that are
pursuing quality and continuous improvement. Benchmarking is the search
for best practices that will lead companies to superior performance
in any aspect of their business. And for QUOIN contractors, benchmarking
is becoming an important part of the solution in addressing the enormous
issue of jobsite safety.
We
all know that if jobsite safety is not managed carefully, it can lead
to worker injuries, costly litigation, sky-rocketing insurance and
workers’ compensation premiums, missed project deadlines, and
OSHA and other regulatory violations and fines. The opportunity to
improve jobsite safety and insure a safer working environment is what
prompted our search for best safety practices that will consistently
lead contractors to superior safety performance.
While benchmarking
in construction safety is not a new concept, in the past it has relied
primarily on comparing EMR’s, lost work days, and number of
incidents or fatalities of one company with those of other companies.
These so-called “lagging indicators” compare safety performance
“after the fact” and do not effectively compare apples
to apples. While these metrics are helpful, they have always been
a view from the rear view mirror. In other words, they told us what
happened rather than telling us what is about to happen precluding
the opportunity for preventative action.
Leading Indicators
At QUOIN, through a collaborative partnership
with DBO2, we are currently focusing our construction safety benchmarking
efforts on what are called “leading” indicators. Leading
indicators provide real-time measures of the current safety practices,
conditions and behaviors that are happening on a jobsite before
an injury occurs so that the appropriate preventative action can
be taken. Examples might include the observation of an individual
who is not wearing gloves as a leading indicator to a hand protection
injury or an individual not wearing glasses as a leading indicator
to an eye injury. Again the idea is to benchmark against “leading
condition and behavior indicators” to insure more preventive
action is taken and opportunities are identified to insure the safest
jobsite possible with fewer workers being hurt.
Utilizing
DBO2’s SafetyNet service, QUOIN contractors
are now able to observe, document and analyze thousands of observations
of both “safe” and “unsafe” practices on
multiple jobsites. Field personnel use mobile handheld devices to
collect job site safety information that is then downloaded via
the Internet into organized reports so that real-time information
can be analyzed and distributed across multiple companies, contacts
and projects. In addition to creating a baseline for a contractor
to use in evaluating safety performance, safety data for our collective
membership is being documented and pooled together. QUOIN contractors
are now using this pooled information to compare with their peers
the frequency of safe and unsafe observations as well as the speed
at which unsafe behaviors or conditions are corrected. In the benchmarking
process at QUOIN, we are still very much in the data gathering stage
where our contractors constantly review safety results as we work
toward building the measurements that will give us the greatest
benefit. Safety directors and field personnel come together in regular
user forums to discuss these results and establish the specific
categories for inspection and definitions for the severity of unsafe
observations. These safety or risk categories measure the number
of safe and unsafe observations on such items as fall protection,
hazard communication and motorized equipment. The observations,
frequency, and corrective actions made by one company on a particular
category item are then compared against the benchmark.
Utilizing
DBO2’s SafetyNet service, QUOIN contractors are now able
to observe, document and analyze thousands of observations of
both “safe” and “unsafe” practices on
multiple jobsites.
|
Pool of Safety Data
On a larger scale, DBO2 is pooling QUOIN’s collective
safety data with safety data from other contractors spread across
the U.S. into a one-of-a-kind National Construction Safety Benchmark.
During the past 18 months, based on over 1,000,000 field observations
from over 1,000 projects involving 3000 general contractors and
specialty contractors, patterns of behavior and conditions are emerging
that were, until now, invisible. This data affords the industry
and QUOIN contractor members with an incredible opportunity to assess
their performance and identify areas where they may be performing
above or below the National average. By examining lessons learned
and best practices, more contractors are finding their way to more
consistent and superior safety performance.
It
is important to mention that participants working together to create
this new industry benchmark at both the local and national level
include general contractors, specialty contractors, consultants,
insurance underwriters and brokers. Our goal with this unique form
of collaboration is to measure how safe the conditions and behaviors
are today on a particular job and not on how well a particular job
performed in the past relative to safety.
In
the end, DBO2’s SafetyNet is measuring conditions
and behaviors that can tell a contractor if they are above or below
the norm and if their company’s behavior is consistent or
inconsistent with those companies demonstrating best safety practices.
No question, we are chipping away at traditional and historical
barriers as we venture into finding new ways to measurably improve
jobsite safety.
Benchmarking
against leading indicators and best safety practices will allow
contractors to make the improvements needed to do a better job of
providing a safer work environment. Still in the beginning stage,
we are already seeing an improved ability to pinpoint safety trouble
spots, identify trends, assess training needs, hold people more
accountable, and create accurate company baselines on safety performance.
This revolutionary new approach to jobsite safety can only get better
and have a bigger impact over time for contractors and our industry.
|
|

|